Jumpstart your project - with downloadable templates, logos, and design components.
Submit your designs to our moderated Design Gallery.
Locate the designer of your dreams in our Designer Portfolio area.
Tell the world your design made the cut at CHP with these stylish badges!
Comments
daniellepark Says:
May 11th, 2004 at 12:00 am
0
thye must be doing something right if they are still in business. I think this site is great!
ddfdsffdfddfdfdf Says:
May 12th, 2002 at 12:00 am
0
agree with cyberjack. the 'inspiration' or links, (circa 1991) takes us to sites that this company has ripped completely and totally. 2advanced, wow, this should be put into a 2advanced rip category. terrible work.
meyou7 Says:
October 11th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
None of his work is original!
johnforz1 Says:
March 7th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
blahzay...blahzay
drewgeriatnaerrlle Says:
February 15th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
I think it looks ok. I'm a big futurama nut, and saw the picture of Fry and Bender on the thumbnail, but I looked all through your work and couldn't find it. Did I miss it? if so, please let me know, or email a copy to me. Much Thanks Drew
asdasdasdasdasd Says:
February 9th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
No way! - I like it. looks great - keep it just the way it is! beutiful work!
hideaway Says:
February 9th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
The site is most certainly not what the thumbnail portrays. I think the splash screen is just a poor copy of 2advanced with a white background. AND the logo this company uses is very similar to 2advanced as well. Working wise? it loads quite quickly, and the lack of soundtrack initially is appreciated, however, loading of additional soundtracks is both long and without notification of loading time and status - obviously huge files. All in all, I would put it at a 5 out of 10. Would love to see what happened with the thumbnail site here though, THAT looks intriguing.
Back toBack Says:
February 6th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
nothing special
Fstop Says:
February 6th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
This site is okay. I think the other comments are a bit harsh, but I totally see their point. The site is very rudimentary in design, and overall color scheme is poor. The mix of bitmap with Flash, within is framed environment is both strange, and confusing. I would not comment as to it being a horrible site, but it is both of poor design, and an obvious immaturity in the Flash authoring environment.
greebala Says:
February 6th, 2001 at 12:00 am
0
I agree with the other comment. This is horrible. How does a site like this make it into these boards? terrible animation, terrible Flash, terrible design.
tonibalooga Says:
November 8th, 2000 at 12:00 am
0
Not what you pictured here, really just another blurry lined eric jordan rip off site. derivative of what is wrong with flash.